My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:28:31 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 11:04:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•>-. <br />.1 v<;" <br />ti«£:' <br />W‘VV^,. <br />^•.. '.'.• .'3- <br />■■-%U <br />wif <br />^ ■■ . ■ <br />si»<- j <br />’. • ■ <br />V*.: <br />MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1992 <br />ORONO SPORTS ARENA - CONT. <br />Vongries felt that a bike path along both County Road 6 and the <br />^ Interior roadway may not be necessary and may destroy any <br />possibility of future development of the property. He felt that <br />everyone was being very conciliatory towards the Hockey <br />Assoc I at I on. <br />Mabusth disagreed and stated that the City did not feel that was <br />the most desireable location for the hockey arena and even the <br />Hockey Ascoclatlon felt that way. <br />Wilson asked If the Interior roadway will continue through the <br />property to the east when developed. <br />Chair Flint said that If there is an Interior roadway there ought <br />to be a trail easement along it as it Is a safer place for a trail <br />than along the County Road. <br />Bradley asked If the easement along the Interior roadway would be <br />an additional 10’ width. He stated that It would be logical to <br />assume the Interior roadway would be a low-speed road and 11 may <br />be possible for It to exist with an extended shoulder for a bike <br />trail. He asked if the access road off County Road 6 to the hockey <br />site would be considered for extension to the frontage road along <br />Highway 12. <br />Mabusth felt that probably would not happen because of extensive <br />wetlands, but explained that the Comprehensive Plan encourages an <br />east/west road linking Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Drive. <br />Wilson stated that It was hard to determine at this point whether <br />both trails would be necessary, but felt they should retain the <br />option. <br />Vongries felt that emphasis should be placed on the ball fields. <br />It was moved by Bradley, seconded by Wilson, to recommend the <br />following: „ ^ *1. North/south trail following County Road Option A; <br />f ' •t..‘.r\-*V .mms:rmsr <br />2. East/west trail south of the County Road 6 utility <br />easement; <br />'V <br />mmmr 3. BiKe trail to follow the Interior roadway; and <br />4. Joint powers agreement regarding the basebal I field west <br />of the proposed hockey arena. <br />Vi <br />Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />w <br />f <br />, ‘ * r*- • ■ I* 1 <br />, ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.