My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:28:31 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 11:04:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W>V ■ <br />'••^7 -p ■ <br />- ^ <br />MINUTES OF THE PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 2, 19S2 <br />ORONO SPORTS ARENA - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained that they would be dealing with the School <br />District as the owner of the land, but the Hockey Association would <br />file the conditional use permit for the proposed hockey arena and <br />would be required by the School District to pay for any land or <br />money dedication. <br />-•■‘t <br />McMillan asked if there would be additional lots parceled off with <br />the subdivision application. <br />m Mabusth explained that an existing platted Interior roadway creates <br />land divisions. She Is aware of three different parcels that would <br />be created with the subdivision. <br />' - <br />Chair Flint explained that they have decided to request easements <br />for bike trails In lieu of land dedication to allow the owner of <br />the property to use tne easement area for required land area and <br />required setbacks. <br />1 <br />Bradley asked if the Ordinance permits the acquisition of land <br />through an easement and still require payment for park dedication. <br />V’'m Chair Flint clarified that the Ordinance refers to the acquisition <br />of land as “an interest in the land". <br />Mabusth explained that In previous subdivisions, the City has <br />required an additional 10’ wide easement for future bike trails. <br />Chair Flint stated the reason for not requiring the total 4 acres <br />for park land Is the nature of the development. He noted he would <br />like to see the proposed trails drawn on the plans. <br />Mabusth said the developer should stake the location of the <br />proposed trail along County Road 6 at the different setbacks to <br />allow the Commission to review the area. <br />Chair Flint stated there are four aspects of the recommendation: <br />1. North/south trail following County Road Option A; <br />2. East/west trail south of the County Road 6 utility <br />easement; <br />3. Bike trail to follow the Interior roadway; and <br />4. Joint powers agreement regarding the baseball field west <br />of the proposed hockey arena. <br />l' , :■ <br />11 <br />m <br />w
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.