Laserfiche WebLink
mm <br />Zoning File #1745 <br />June 10, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Applicant proposes the removal of approximately 20 s.f. of <br />patio block in exchange for some 250 s.f. of additional <br />hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area. <br />a. <br />• ■ * <br />Can the new deck structure be modified so to minimize <br />additional hardcover in lakeshore protected area? <br />b. <br />mm <br />Are there other existing improvements within the 0-75' <br />setback area that can be removed? <br />; .Is the existing porch area to the west side of the <br />house a concrete patio or deck as current plans <br />propose? Is applicant proposing construction of a deck <br />where existing patio is now shown? <br />Review Exhibit K. Note storage loft area now proposed <br />within the proposed attic area. <br />' 'HH <br />a.Is it to remain exclusively for storage? <br />b.How does the expanded roof design impact new foundation <br />needs? <br />c. <br />te:"-#: <br />Refer to Exhibits L and N, new overhang is now tied <br />into gable rocf design. This is a more intense, <br />permanent structural improvement than current flat <br />overhead structure. <br />d.Pending receipt of a report on the status of the <br />existing foundation, the RS district requires major <br />upgrading of foundation, would applicant be best <br />advised to move structure out of the lakeshore <br />protected area and into the 75-250' building envelope? <br />Statement of Hardships <br />Please refer to Exhibit A. Staff would add the following; <br />1.Property is a peninsula and limited by 0-75' lakeshore <br />setback area. <br />2.The majority of the one acre lot is located within the <br />0-75' setback area at 38,430 s.f. <br />3. Structure was installed prior to lakeshore standards in <br />1963. <br />4. Entire structure is located within the 0-75' lakeshore <br />protected zone. <br />V. <br />-.4 <br />fe;v , <br />I <br />■! <br />j