My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
06-15-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 11:28:31 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 11:04:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1745 <br />June 10, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />Description of Request <br />la: <br />The applicant proposes major alterations of existing cabin <br />I consisting of an attic expansion for storage purposes, new siding <br />and windows and alterations/remodeling of interior layout. <br />Review Exhibit H and I, the existing deck on the south side will <br />remain as shown at 8' x 22*. Applicant will reinstall a new <br />overhang over the existing grade level patio measuring <br />approximately 7' x 17' to the west side. Note overhang is now <br />part of the gabled roof design and has been relocated slightly to <br />the south so that it no longer blocks view windows along west <br />side of structure. Review Exhibit I, the new additions to the <br />cottage consist of grade level deck and proposed screened porch. <br />250.6 s.f. of the grade level deck is located within the 0-75' <br />setback area and 630.52 s.f. of the improvement is located within <br />the 75-250' setback area. <br />'a <br />V - <br />J. <br />f-K-- <br />Variances are required for all improvements to structure <br />located within 0-75' setback area and for portion of grade level <br />deck also located within 0-75' setback area. Per Gaffron's memo <br />variances will also be required for treatment of grey—water from <br />existing single sink in kitchen area of dwelling. There is no <br />way that an on-site septic system can be developed within the <br />limited area within the 75-250' setback area. The only option <br />available to applicant if sink is to remain is to approve a <br />variance for the use of a holding tank. Review Exhibit E, note <br />the specific conditions set forth for any use of a holding tank <br />on a Big Island property. As Gaffron's memo also notes, there <br />has not been a request for a holding tank on Big Island since the <br />1978 septic codes were adopted. It is the practice of the City <br />whenever a property owner seeks approval for the use of a holding <br />tank that Council approval is required. There are several <br />physical limitations that will create problems for the <br />installation of a holding tank on this property and if approved <br />will require special design features. <br />The RS district requires foundations, at permanent frost <br />depth, solid masonry or treated wood foundation that completely <br />encloses the entire perimeter of the building. Staff has no <br />knowledge as to the type of foundation that exists today. Review <br />Exhibit N. The Assessor's record notes cabin was constructed in <br />1963 with footings only. There is no record of any additional <br />improvements to the foundation since 1963. Applicant has been <br />asked to arrange for an inspection by the Building Inspector, <br />hopefully, prior to our meeting of Monday evening, so that they <br />can report on the status of the current foundation and what <br />applicant will be expected to provide. If structure is to be <br />raised and a new foundation installed, applicant may be asked to <br />move structure within the limited building envelope within the <br />75-250' setback area. (Review Exhibit J.) <br />AS <br />Mpmm <br />*• C- <br />• I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.