Laserfiche WebLink
Cr'-" ■ it-V'-* <br />' * •■;• <br />Zoning Pile #1742 <br />June lOr 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />Bl-2 - Applicant's Addendum <br />C <br />D <br />El-2 <br />P <br />Gl-2 <br />Property Owner's List <br />Plat Map <br />Survey <br />Floor Plan <br />Building Elevation <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants propose a family/room garage addition to the east side <br />Of the existing residence and a 16'x28' bedroom addition to the south <br />side requiring the approval of multiple setback variances. Applicants <br />own 6 I'^ts. Lots 22 through 24 and 1 through 3 have been legally <br />combined binder two separate PID's but because of the 12' alley <br />separatioUf applicants have been unable to legally combine all <br />parcels. The City will attempt to file the legal combination at the <br />City offices. If County refuses the legal combination, the City will <br />ask applicants to execute a special lot combination as a condition of <br />the multiple variance approval. Though applicants' addendum Exhibit <br />B, suggests that a rear setback variance would not be required upon <br />the legal combination, staff would hold that the rear setback for a <br />principal structure would still be required because of the 12' alley. <br />In previous applications dealing with setback from unpaved alleys <br />where oroperties are legally combined on both sides of alley, the 10' <br />setback was still required. The legal combination^ 11 have an impact <br />on lot coverage. In reviewing Exhibit D, it 'i noted that the <br />County has approved previous legal combinations - i ^.-operties divided <br />IF by the 12' alley so it appears that the County has already approved <br />similar legal combinations. <br />The applicants also propose the removal of the existing detached <br />garage that encroaches 2' within the Dickinson Street right-of-way and <br />the temporary garden shed. <br />' <br />The City cannot consider the vacation of the 12' alley as it is <br />currently used by property owners to the south for access. Current <br />proposal shows the detached garage with doors facing towards alley. <br />Applicants will also achieve access from 12' alley. Although actual <br />setback to alley is shown at 10'6", the garage will be 18'6" from the <br />portion of the traveled or developed alley right-of-way. A new curb <br />cut onto public right-of-way must be approved by the Public Works <br />Department. It appears that the limited setback distance will <br />necessitate portions of the turn around to be located on the public <br />right-of-way and should also be approved by the Public Works <br />Department. <br />J <br />r- .