Laserfiche WebLink
I’-. <br />rr* <br />if- ■ <br />f <br />\’ ' <br />r*lii*>V j _'• • "#&< .• <br />f^.V i»4 Vv '■•■’ . , •» v»‘ -r <br /><v> » <br />MnOSB OW THB FUUOII9G COMMISSZOIf NBETIMG APRIL 17, 1989 <br />KMZRO PZLB «13<7 BASRZS<COamDBO <br />that vould not bo a probloa. ' <br />**f*/ ®*^y Buttorflold sold tb*t Mr. Barrla'a pond would <br />cono within 50* of tholr proporty lino. 6ho aald that what would <br />bo an attractivo addition for Mr. Harrla but would bo an <br />unattractlva nulaance for hor. <br />thi« *1V/*.K® co"i»«nto froo the public regardingthia matter and the public hoarlng waa closed. ^ <br />ni »ov^ by Planning Commlaaloner Johnaon, aecondod by <br />auggoatod that the flowage and conaervatlon eaaoBont <br />takra aa far as the draintilo rune on the appllcanta proporty If <br />that can be determined. Johnaon amended hia motion to includo <br />^ondltlon, Cohen seconded. Motion« Ayea>*6, Maya^O, Motion <br />• 1C75 DAVID PRICB <br />2914 CASCO POIMT ROAD <br />VARTAMCB <br />COMmOATIOM or PUBLIC BBARZSG 8i2S P.M. TO 8i30 P.M. <br />Mr. Price waa proaent for thia matter. <br />Aasistanc Planning and Zoning Admlnlatrator Caffron eaid <br />that the applicants were originally seeking an average lakoshore <br />aet^ca Variance as well as a variance to slightly incroa«o <br />nardcover. The applicants have since revised their proposal so <br />that thu proposed addition would remain the same, but the patio <br />area would be decreased. This would result in a decrease in <br />h.rdcov.r 1„ Uh. 75-250- .on. to 27.34». Anoth.r .rpr....d <br />m <br />■I <br />3 <br />mm mmm