08-17-1992 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r X V n-'t . I'- Zoning File #1759 August 12, 1992 Page 2 The .259 acre parcel consisting of half dry and wetland areas has been confirmed as area unsuitable for septic use because of its proximity to the designated wetland. Upon a site inspection of the property, Mrs. Wells advised that based on the location of the houses and the existing landscaping, the quarter acre parcel belongs more with the Proft property and is in fact maintained by the Profts. Please review Exhibits E, F and G, reports of Weckman and Schirmers and the septic map for the Wells property. The Wells property provides no additional areas suitable for septic development based on the water table and steep topography. The existing septic system appears to support the three bedroom residence at the current level of use. Issues for Consideratii Definition 65 calls for a subdivision when lot line rearrangement involves properties that do not meet the standards of the zoning code. As the subdivision does not involve the creation of a new buildable lot, the City need not address the issue of variances. Issues for the Planning Commissi 1.Should there be an objection to reducing a rural lot that is already substandard? 2.How do we deal with the issue of the Wells property where there is no ability to expand for septic needs? This subdivision will require notice to both current and future owners of the septic limitations of the parcel. Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: 1.Parcel to be acquired by Profts must be legally combined with the homestead property (this should include parcel with 6' wide corridor along west side of Tract B). 2.Applicants to execute conservation and flowage easement over designated wetland areas. 3.Notice to current and future owner of Parcel 2 that property does not contain suitable or adequate area to expand septic capabilities if required as a result of a proposed improvement involving greater water use. Isv