Laserfiche WebLink
mm.rvmf’". <br />TTV’' m-5*^*if <br />■■6, <br />Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Peterson and City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Date <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator <br />May 12, 1992 <br />#1731 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Variance - <br />Public Hearing <br />ertinent Ordinances - <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - 3 1/2' high fences/walls are <br />l-’vf <br />9 * <br />nonencroachments within any yard area. (Review Exhibit G.) <br />M <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (E) - 6' high fences/walls allowed <br />in rear yards of properties. (Review Exhibit G.) <br />:'v?i <br />Section 10.03, Subdivison 15 (F) - 6' high fences/walls allowed <br />within side yards. (Review Exhibit G.) <br />■ 'i. <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Traffic Visibility - Plantings <br />and structures limited to 3' height within 30’ protection zone (Review <br />Exhibit E). <br />Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 - LR-lC District required setbacks: <br />Front/street = 30' <br />Rear « 30' <br />Side -= 10' <br />Side/street “ 15* <br />Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - setback from wetland: <br />Required ■* 26' <br />wm <br />Applicant seeks height variance for pillars (fencing) installed <br />in proposed front and side street yards of two future building sites <br />(Review Exhibit I), <br />Front <br />Allowed 3 1/2' <br />Proposed 4 1/2' <br />Variance = 1 or 33.3% <br />Side <br />HIMefecrrs <br />Allowed “ 6' per Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F). During <br />the preliminary discussions with staff in the <br />preparation of the land alteration application, <br />applicant sought advice as to an allowed height for a <br />wall like structure. Based on the property owned by <br />applicant (Review Exhibit H), staff advised that it <br />iiii <br />Sil:I iiiBt I <br />t J <br />■•aJ <br />■rv*.'