My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
05-18-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:43:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:54:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ■ -' t* ^ <br />..-V <br />■ »”V- ‘ " 'V^.‘ <br />r*t.'-' <br />Zoning Pile #1729 <br />April 16, 1992 <br />Page 4 <br />t ^ <br />.11 <br />/••• <br />It is recommended that the applicant at this time have a <br />surveyor confirm the dry buildable envelope of the remaining <br />contiguous property within Lot 56. If the surveyor provides this <br />certification in area, applicant need not combine remaining Lot <br />56 with his homestead parcel. As currently proposed, the City <br />must reguire the legal combination with Rood's homestead parcel. <br />The applicant should also consider the impact of the separation <br />of Lot 56 from the homestead parcel. If Lot 56 is to be <br />developed as a building site, the homestead parcel will lose <br />control over the majority of the now shared improvements. Staff <br />strongly recommends that Mr. Rood consider the impact of <br />current subdivision and his comprehensive plan for the <br />development of this property. Rood may be well advised to alter <br />this application to a two or three lot plat. <br />Options Available to Applicant <br />hi.'Mr. Rood has the following options concerning the proposed <br />lot line rearrangement subdivision application: <br />1.Proceed with the current mSjIrs and bounds lot line <br />m • .A ^ ^ ^ W <br />):}iwm <br />:r“- •,/PS-:-'Vciv-B— <br />Wif <br />rearrangement and amend the current alignment so that there <br />is 1/2 acre dry buildable land within the proposed building <br />site. <br />ife:-:. <br />feii <br />;• <br />If applicant provides confirmation that remaining Lot 56 has <br />1/2 acre of dry contiguous land to the immediate east of the <br />proposed building site, applicant need not legally combine <br />with homestead parcel. Based on the facts currently <br />presented for the City's review, remaining parcel 56 would <br />have to be combinad with Rood's homestead. <br />OR <br />To refile a Class II subdivision of a replat of two or three <br />lots with the inclusion of the homestead parcel. <br />Platting of this property will also simplify the problems <br />with filing the Conservation and Flowage Easement required <br />in Application #1604. <br />Staff Recoomendatioii <br />if?-'- <br />staff would recommend that the subdivision application be <br />tabled until applicant has determined how he wishes to proceed <br />with the comprehensive development of the properry and to provide <br />the City with the necessary information to complete that <br />subdivision. Any condition of approval will require that <br />applicant prepare the appropriate Certificates of Title and deeds <br />SO thst th6 rsquirod documentation can be filed against the Chain <br />of Titles of the properties.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.