Laserfiche WebLink
'** ■• <br />,- ■'*•1 <br />-r;>- <br />'■' : *»' <br />^'m <br />atnl^'a <br />•?;ii <br />' J* ; ■ ^ <br />fif <br />;.;-2^4ia P <br />S-.vAiX':',m <br />‘V <br />mM <br />■i , • -iC' <br />;V-_ <br />^ .r. <br />Lr< <br />m <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 20, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1726 - CONT. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1726 for Barbara and James Oiexa of 995 <br />WiIdhurst Trail, for side setback and hardcover variances to <br />construct an addition to the existing residence, subject to the <br />removal of the existing detached garage and all plastic under rock <br />be removed on the property. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(#9) #1728 MOLLY AND DRAPER JAFFRAY, <br />540 BARRETT AVENUE - VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 - 8:10 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat I on and Certificate of MallIng were noted. <br />Molly and Draper Jaffray were present. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicants are proposing a three story <br />addition which requires a street setback variance of 25’. The <br />existing residence is 12’ from the right-of-way. The proposed <br />addition will be 25’ from the right-of-way where a 50’ setback is <br />required. She noted the garage to be located at the lower level, <br />the family room on the first floor, and a bedroom on the second <br />floor. Access to the garage will be gained through the alley to <br />the east, and the applicants will still maintain access onto <br />Barrett Avenue. <br />Rowlette asked the intentions for the existing garage and felt It <br />could be in a hazardous condition. <br />Mr. Jaffray stated that they would like to leave the garage for <br />storage, and In the future they may either repair It or remove it. <br />Cohen asked if the City has ordinances requiring the maintenance <br />of such structures. <br />Mabusth stated that there is not specific standards for maintenance <br />of structures, but if a building is found to be hazardous, then <br />the City can proceed with legal action. She stated the rear wail <br />of the garage Is pushed out because of pressure from the hill. She <br />noted that If the building were removed, the owner would need to <br />install some type of retaining wall. If the structure were to be <br />rebuilt, it would require variance approval. <br />Jaffray understood staff recommendation to remove the existing <br />garage and felt that would be reasonable. <br />Peterson asked If the garage could be aliowed to remain until <br />completion of the new garage. <br />8 <br />i <br />t* <br />11 iitifft