03-16-1992 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1716 March 10f 1992 Page 2 Description of Request *--,i •■. The applicant proposes a lot line rearrangement between Parcels A and B. Parcel A is the site of a former market, a nonconforming commercial use of residential zoned property for many years. The retail use has been discontinued for over a year and must revert back to a legal residential use. Parcel B, the residentially developed site, is to be divided off of the original 18 acre parcel owned by Cliif Otten. Review Exhibit J, in 1990 the 18 acre parcel was the subject of a two lot subdivision approved by the City in April of 1990 but preliminary approval expired in April of 1991. Review Exhibits D and E, title difficulties arose when it was discovered that the vacated old county road had not been formally approved by resolution of the County Board. Since the 1990 plat application. Cliff Otten and his brother have purchased the former market site and now include the property with the current application as part of the lot line rearrangement. Review Cosments of Current Subdivision ■T' . ■C: Lot Configuration - i 'mmmsmmmmim Parcels B and C obviously meet the required rural standards of the RR-IB zone. Parcel A has been reduced in area from 1.64 to 1.5. Please review Exhibit O, note area of the former roadbed. It is an area unsuitable for septic use or expansion. The vacated roadbed may qualify for additional ig^area but not as dry buildable needed for septic use. In addition the existing improvements on Parcel B also limit the opportunity of the City to increase the lot size of Parcel A. Parcel A shall be discussed in more detail under the septic review. Parcel B shall be recognized as a through lot. All future accessory structures shall require conditional use permits. ' -■ ’ ■S' <*-• It is staff ’s understanding that the purpose for the lot line rearrangement is to relocate the driveway exiting off County Road 6 within the new lot lines of Parcel B. Refer to staff's sketch Exhibit N. After your site inspection, it will be apparent that many of the existing improvements tied to the residence on Parcel B will be intersected by the proposed division line (look along the line of the power poles that defines the existing division line). The area to be added to Parcel A is useless for septic needs. Parcel A must retain the dry land area to the northeast (adjacent to former roadbed) for future septic expansion. Staff recommends a division line as shown on Exhibit N, Parcel B retains the access drive from County Road 6. 5:'V, ■ ■ ■ '■ iVi-v ■r-mm 1 A