My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 8:28:35 AM
Creation date
1/18/2023 8:28:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> November 21,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Libby asked what the total buildable portion would be. <br /> Mr. Johnson replied it is a one acre zone so there would be two that would be 1.5 acres and one that <br /> would be just under 1.5 acres. He noted there will not be any non-conforming lots from his ownership. <br /> Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:27 p.m. <br /> Brian Turbeville, 997 Wildhurst Trail,is concerned that this is putting the cart before the horse.In <br /> granting the vacation of these pieces,words are words about what will be constructed on the property. <br /> Ultimately, as stated by the DNR there is no public benefit for vacating these PIDs.From his <br /> understanding the other access to the lake has been contested multiple times at City Council and City <br /> Planning.He said the way the landscaping is set up on that property there is no access to the lake, so that <br /> property is inaccessible by the public.He has given some written comment and he and his wife are <br /> opposed to this without knowing what will happen on the property. He thinks it is extremely relevant to <br /> know what will happen to the 10 acres on the other side and believes the potential owner of that property <br /> is here and stated the 2020/2040 Comprehensive Plan states it is intended to be mostly rural,keep things <br /> natural,and there is an abundance of wildlife in those woods with the 10 acres abutting Saga Hill Park. <br /> Penny Saiki,2874 Casco Point, stated last Monday at the City Council meeting,Mayor Walsh reminded <br /> them that Council Members are elected and charged to work for the citizens.Many vote and do not pay <br /> attention,trusting that those elected are acting in good faith for the public purpose.Ms. Saiki was jolted <br /> awake by the Star Tribune article on the vacancy of the fire lane and City-paid cul-de-sac for the benefit <br /> of Commissioner Erickson who donated$100,000 to the parks making it a tax deduction.Rumor has it <br /> that it will be listed in 2023 for$300,000. If the Erickson's return all of it to the parks or other City <br /> coffers it will restore her faith in his doing it for the public good, future tax deduction aside. This land at <br /> 1003 Wildhurst Trail and proposed vacation of City easements has come up many times before.The DNR <br /> is against the vacancy because it is not in the public interest. On October 8,2018,the City Council <br /> discussed the development and said they wanted to preserve the open character of Orono and hold to the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. While holding to the Comp Plan the Codes are morphing,attempting to make it <br /> easier to improve a property and in the process,variances are being granted to Ordinances. Ordinances are <br /> laws and Ms. Saiki said to be aware as the City alters the laws,liability enters the picture. Councilman <br /> Johnson, as a real estate agent requesting this vacation, owes transparency on the transaction of exchange <br /> of real property.There needs to be disclosure of the value of the lane presently owned before and after the <br /> vacation and the good that it is to the public. <br /> Alena Severson,4635 Tonkaview Lane, said regarding the 10 acre lot, she is in a purchase agreement for <br /> 5 acres of it to build a single-family home,they will not tear down the trees,and will keep it simple and <br /> small. She clarified Mr. Johnson will have the other 5 acres and it will be two separate lots,rather than a <br /> development which are the rumors going around. She does not think Mr.Johnson's property has a fire <br /> lane that anyone would have access to the lake right now. She clarified they do not have any plans to <br /> vacate from the park down to Wildhurst, either. <br /> Barbara Schmidt,50 Landmark Drive,noted when looking up 1003 Wildhurst Trail the 10 acre lot comes <br /> up which is really confusing. <br /> Curtis clarified they were all previously in common ownership. <br /> Ms. Schmidt noted it was not in the presentation. <br /> Page 3 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.