My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
11-21-2022 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 8:28:35 AM
Creation date
1/18/2023 8:28:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> November 21,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Ressler moved,Bollis seconded,to LA22-000054,3275 Carman Road,Variance.VOTE: Ayes: 4, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> 1. LA22-000050 MATT JOHNSON, 1003 WILDHURST TRAIL(INCLUDING PIDS 07-117- <br /> 23-21-0006; 07-117-23-21-0007; 07-117-23-21-0016; 07-117-23-21-0002),REQUESTS <br /> VACATION OF UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY. <br /> Matt Johnson,Applicant,was present. <br /> City Planner Curtis gave a presentation on the item, stating the Applicant is requesting to vacate the <br /> unimproved portions of right-of-way adjacent to his property. This includes the right-of-way of Lafayette <br /> Avenue, Grandview Place,Hattie Place, and the alley running down the middle. There is an existing City <br /> sewer line within the Hattie Place right-of-way serving the home at 1003 Wildhurst Trail in addition to an <br /> overhead power line running from north to south. If vacated,the Applicant has proposed maintaining a <br /> utility easement serving these structures. In 2018 under application#LA18-000065,the City reviewed a <br /> subdivision sketch plan for the properties associated with 1003 Wildhurst Trail(including the 10 acre <br /> property to the west).The project included vacation of the subject rights-of way and development of the <br /> properties into 7 total lots At that time,the Planning Commission and Council were open to the proposal <br /> for vacating the rights-of-way as long as access to Saga Hill Park was maintained;they were not in favor <br /> of the overall project resulting in the creation of substandard lots.The City's Engineers reviewed the <br /> proposal and do not oppose the vacation of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place,and the alley;the <br /> Engineer recommends the City not vacate Hattie Place indicating that portion of right-of-way provides <br /> public benefit with the sanitary sewer utilities and potential future access to abutting parcels. The <br /> corridors addressed in this application have not been identified as lake access points in the City's <br /> Comprehensive Plan.The Minnesota DNR has reviewed the request and provided comments included in <br /> the packet.The DNR opposes the vacation indicating that it does not provide a public benefit nor protect <br /> future public use of land abutting the lake.Utility companies have been notified and none opposed the <br /> vacation.Public comments have been received and have been included in the packet. Staff recommends <br /> approval of the vacation of Lafayette Avenue, Grandview Place,and the alley; Staff recommends denial <br /> of Hattie Place at this time. <br /> Matt Johnson clarified he is on the City Council and is purchasing this property for himself,he is not <br /> selling it to anyone else and it is not for a development purpose but for his family. He shared he will be <br /> available after the meeting to address any questions from neighbors.Mr.Johnson noted he was not on the <br /> City Council in 2018 when it was voted on to vacate the right-of-ways. He spoke about Forest Bay <br /> vacations due to platting extending into Lake Minnetonka,and in speaking with a surveyor the platting <br /> was done prior to the Gray's Bay Dam which brought the lake water level up 10-12 feet.Mr.Johnson <br /> stated many of the properties on Forest Bay have had vacations because otherwise they would not own <br /> any lakeshore.Regarding this particular parcel,the owners did not elect to take advantage of the vacation <br /> on Wildhurst Trail as did other neighbors.He provided an illustration showing vacations on the block and <br /> what he is requesting and spoke about the three PIDs in this application. Mr.Johnson stated he hopes to <br /> have his parents living on the site with his family and hopes to be a good neighbor to everyone. <br /> Ressler asked if there are sketches of what Mr.Johnson proposes to put on the site. <br /> Mr.Johnson replied until it is approved there is not much sense in getting too far down the road of what it <br /> would be. <br /> Page 2 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.