My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 8:30:00 AM
Creation date
1/18/2023 7:56:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />November 21, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />Curtis replied it is not part of the application. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt stated it is super misleading and the public should know all that the previous commenter <br />shared. She thinks for full disclosure it looks bad and they need to tell the public. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the other property will be a public hearing when there is a subdivision application and will be <br />a public process. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt stated last year the Planning Commission was asked to vacate Lake Minnetonka public <br />access lakeshore on Stubbs Bay and voted against it. Ultimately the City Council voted to vacate the land <br />and it went to a sitting Planning Commissioner, Bob Erickson, for his own wealth and portfolio. This is a <br />similar situation, it is not fair, and all citizens should have access to this type of vacation. If they are going <br />to vacate this, it should be open to the public and they should ask all the neighbors if they want a piece of <br />it. The question is whether this is in the best interest of the Orono citizens and that should be asked over <br />and over in all of these deals. Several City officials and the DNR have said it is not in the best interest for <br />Orono, both for Mr. Erickson’s deal and this deal. Many citizens voiced their concern that this is <br />depleting public land assets and she would like to know how much public land has been given away since <br />Mayor Walsh came into office. Privatizing lake access or land for one individual does not help all of <br />them. The Planning Commission is being asked to vacate this land to benefit a sitting Orono City Council <br />Member, Mr. Matt Johnson, for his own wealth portfolio. She asked the Commissioners to vote to benefit <br />the Orono citizens and not just single individuals. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon noted Commissioner Bollis must leave at this time (6:38 p.m.) and they have four <br />Commissioners present which is a quorum. <br /> <br />Carol Price, 2813 Casco Point Road, finds it extremely unfair that they are giving away land to an <br />individual and whether they have good intentions or not, it is not for the benefit of the citizens of Orono. <br />She would like the Planning Commission and City Council to take into account that they need some of <br />these open spaces and access points. Over the years it does tend to creep in by the neighbors and pretty <br />soon the access point is gone. Regarding a recent fire in her neighborhood, the fire department had a <br />terrible time getting through the properties to put out a fire. The public needs to preserve these open areas <br />and as a retired person on a fixed income, Ms. Price does not like giving away pieces of land. If the City <br />wanted to sell this land it would make a different point for her and would be an open discussion. She said <br />to sell these plots of land if they are thinking of tax implications but not to give them away. Ms. Price <br />asked them to look judiciously at the access points they currently have because the City needs them for <br />years to come and they cannot be short-sighted. <br /> <br />Melissa Munsch, 1001 Wildhurst Trail, is next to the Applicant’s property and sent an email with <br />concerns. She does not understand the overlying purpose of the Applicant’s use of land. The previous <br />property owner never requested the vacation and if Mr. Johnson is planning to use the property for <br />himself, she does not understand why he needs to make this request. <br /> <br />Tom Fleck, 995 Wildhurst Trail, did not understand there was a lake access there but thinks they need to <br />look to the future and what the City needs 50 or 100 years from now. If they give it up they are giving it <br />up forever. Mr. Fleck does not know much about the project yet as he just received the package on Friday <br />and he would like to learn more. He hopes the Commissioners can table it until he can learn more and <br />speak with Mr. Johnson.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.