My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
01-17-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2023 8:30:00 AM
Creation date
1/18/2023 7:56:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />November 21, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 13 <br /> <br />Libby asked what the total buildable portion would be. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson replied it is a one acre zone so there would be two that would be 1.5 acres and one that <br />would be just under 1.5 acres. He noted there will not be any non-conforming lots from his ownership. <br /> <br />Chair McCutcheon opened the public hearing at 6:27 p.m. <br /> <br />Brian Turbeville, 997 Wildhurst Trail, is concerned that this is putting the cart before the horse. In <br />granting the vacation of these pieces, words are words about what will be constructed on the property. <br />Ultimately, as stated by the DNR there is no public benefit for vacating these PIDs. From his <br />understanding the other access to the lake has been contested multiple times at City Council and City <br />Planning. He said the way the landscaping is set up on that property there is no access to the lake, so that <br />property is inaccessible by the public. He has given some written comment and he and his wife are <br />opposed to this without knowing what will happen on the property. He thinks it is extremely relevant to <br />know what will happen to the 10 acres on the other side and believes the potential owner of that property <br />is here and stated the 2020/2040 Comprehensive Plan states it is intended to be mostly rural, keep things <br />natural, and there is an abundance of wildlife in those woods with the 10 acres abutting Saga Hill Park. <br /> <br />Penny Saiki, 2874 Casco Point, stated last Monday at the City Council meeting, Mayor Walsh reminded <br />them that Council Members are elected and charged to work for the citizens. Many vote and do not pay <br />attention, trusting that those elected are acting in good faith for the public purpose. Ms. Saiki was jolted <br />awake by the Star Tribune article on the vacancy of the fire lane and City-paid cul-de-sac for the benefit <br />of Commissioner Erickson who donated $100,000 to the parks making it a tax deduction. Rumor has it <br />that it will be listed in 2023 for $300,000. If the Erickson’s return all of it to the parks or other City <br />coffers it will restore her faith in his doing it for the public good, future tax deduction aside. This land at <br />1003 Wildhurst Trail and proposed vacation of City easements has come up many times before. The DNR <br />is against the vacancy because it is not in the public interest. On October 8, 2018, the City Council <br />discussed the development and said they wanted to preserve the open character of Orono and hold to the <br />Comprehensive Plan. While holding to the Comp Plan the Codes are morphing, attempting to make it <br />easier to improve a property and in the process, variances are being granted to Ordinances. Ordinances are <br />laws and Ms. Saiki said to be aware as the City alters the laws, liability enters the picture. Councilman <br />Johnson, as a real estate agent requesting this vacation, owes transparency on the transaction of exchange <br />of real property. There needs to be disclosure of the value of the lane presently owned before and after the <br />vacation and the good that it is to the public. <br /> <br />Alena Severson, 4635 Tonkaview Lane, said regarding the 10 acre lot, she is in a purchase agreement for <br />5 acres of it to build a single-family home, they will not tear down the trees, and will keep it simple and <br />small. She clarified Mr. Johnson will have the other 5 acres and it will be two separate lots, rather than a <br />development which are the rumors going around. She does not think Mr. Johnson’s property has a fire <br />lane that anyone would have access to the lake right now. She clarified they do not have any plans to <br />vacate from the park down to Wildhurst, either. <br /> <br />Barbara Schmidt, 50 Landmark Drive, noted when looking up 1003 Wildhurst Trail the 10 acre lot comes <br />up which is really confusing. <br /> <br />Curtis clarified they were all previously in common ownership. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt noted it was not in the presentation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.