My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, November 28,2005 <br />7:00 o’dock p.m. <br />(#05-3102 City ofOroao Zoalag St Sabdivtiloa Code Ameadmeat, Coatiaaed) <br />Muiphy reiterated that he would prefer to see the gate and would like to ad<h%ss each situation <br />individually, but that in his opinion the post would be attached to the fence and should be considered part <br />of the fence. <br />Sansevere commented that someone could call a fence post a monument unless it is better defined. <br />Gafiron inquired whether the Council would like to have the diameter of a monument defined <br />Sansevere stated in his view the way the language currently reads, a fence post could be considered a <br />monument. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion a fence post is different than a monument. <br />White inquired whether arches are allowed. <br />Gaffron stated arches are not allowed. Gafiron indicated arches have been apfM'Oved in the past through a <br />conditional use permit or a variance. <br />Murphy suggested this ordinance amendment be approved tonight, and that if that situation arises in the <br />future, it could be discussed at that time. <br />Marphy moved. White sccoadcd, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 30,3'*'’ SERIES, an Ordinance <br />amending the CUy of Orono Zoning Code Section 78-1405 regarding noncncroachments. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />d. CHARLIE JAMES, 425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH - REQUEST FOR LAND <br />ALTERATION PERMIT FOR TOPSOIL STRIPPING/STOCKPILING <br />White inquired if the City has the right to stop the hauling if the City determines that the stockpiling of <br />the dirt or hauling is problematic. <br />Gafiron stated in his view the application is incomplete at the present time. Gaffron indicated if the <br />applicant submits the appropriate documents, the City would have a plan for the temporar>' disposal of the <br />fill that will specify the height of the dirt pile and other parameters for the time that the fill is sitting there. <br />Gafiron noted the present plan is not usable and requires more detail and engineering work before it can <br />be approved. <br />White expressed a concern for possible din blowing in the area and other issues that may not have been <br />given much consu’eration. <br />McMillan inquired how long it is anticipated the fill will remain. <br />I 'PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.