12-12-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I r i MS-3191 September IS, 2MS Page 4 Applicant must address Conservation Design for this site. (Not thoroughly addressed yet) Buffer impacts need to be considered once the wetland moratorium is done and MCWD indicates their position on wetland filling. (Under consideration) Wetlands and ponding should be in a separate outlet to be owned by a Homeowners Association (Partially complied with) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the appropriate limitation on how much is built on each lot, and PC will reconunend that the 15% lot coverage limit not apply. (OK) The 10% recreation area requirement does apply, and an option would be to make it a perimeter trail system in a perimeter outlot partial conipl'ance, in tliat Outlet B provides for about % acre of the approximately % acre required private recreation area, based on 10% of the residential development excluding the church property, Lot 2) Remaining Issues To Be Resolved or For Consideration 1.Applicant must provide a suitable plans and elevation vieA^ showing how development of the site can meet the City ’s Conservation Design goals. 2.Plan must be revised to show the 45* combined wetland buffer/setback as it impacts the defined buildable envelope of Lots 6 thru 10. If as a result one or more of these lots becomes fimtionally unbuildable, revisions will have to be made to accommodate that. Alternatively, applicant might take the appropriate steps to challenge the wetland’s management classification and hope for a lesser buffer requirement. 3.Should the stormwater ponding area in Lot 6 be in an Outlot? What is the nature/intent of that ponding area? Does Outlot B meet the 10% recreation area requirement? Whal additional options should ai^licant consider for meeting that requirement? S. Plans should be revised to show a 10’trail easement along the west boundary of the property. Staff Recommendation Discussion of the above issues should provide qjplicant and staff with direction as to how the proposed plat should be further revised. Staff recommends tabling for further plan refinement, but would note that any renuuning topics left unaddressed to date should be brought \q> for discussion. ------- ----- ^ -I III i\ II iiiliiiltitiiii