My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1.: <br />f- ■■ <br />setback from the buffer to 10’ on either side of the lot line between lots 7 and 8 <br />and the backyard of lot 8. <br />2. The intention of tlie setback was to ensure that a reasonable area is left natural <br />surrounding the wetlands, especially when a backyard size is ii~nited due to the <br />buffer and mowing up to the edge has been done following the improvement of <br />some projects. Our proposal has Lot 8 with an adequate backyard and we are <br />asking that the side yard setback off of the buffer be reduced to (10’). This is (10’) <br />more than the old Orono and less than the new Orono (25 ’) requirements which <br />can be maintained without intruding into a backyard. <br />3. The only wetland affecting our grading and house locations is the small intrusion <br />wetland on lot 8 that is described the same as the larger adjoining wetland. The <br />category of the small wetland has been determined to be the same as the larger <br />wetland when the character and value of these two wetlands are different. <br />This wetland is higher in elevation than the main wetland and the primary reason <br />that it has wetland characteristics is the additional runoff directed to it from the <br />church grading in the walkout and swale from their basement. <br />We are requesting that this wetland follow the same buffer as required by MCWD <br />and that the City of Orono would adjust the new wetland setbaclc A compromise <br />of 10’ appears to be reasonable. <br />Conservation Design: <br />Our recent grading plan revision would allow us to maintain a large portion of the <br />substantial trees that border this site to the southeast. This will maintain a primary <br />view buffer of the existing substantial trees. <br />There will be clearing of the center of the site for construction. The primary <br />vegetation in the core of the site is buckthorn and some smaller second growth elm <br />and box elder. The new landscaping would be a significant improvement to the <br />vegetation type and placement of new coniferous and deciduous trees. <br />Following die completion of the residences, landscape requirements will be enforced <br />to plant and maintain a buffer along the back lots of 6,7,8,9,10 and the backside of <br />the pond in Outlot A. This may be enforced by either association declarations or by a <br />scenic easement placed along those areas of the lots. <br />The landscape plan and material list can be reviewed and approved with input from <br />the City and any consultants prior to the Final Plat approval. A cross section will be <br />includ^ in the final landscape plan. <br />-------- --
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.