Laserfiche WebLink
U J Bonestroo <br />£9 Rosene <br />Anderlik& <br />Associates <br />Enginearf & Architects <br />2335 VHIest Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 <br />Orfice. 651-636-4600 • Fax; 65I-636-I3II <br />www.bonestroo.com <br />December 7,2005 <br />Mr. Michael Gaf&on <br />Planning Director <br />City of Orono <br />Post Office Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota SS323 <br />Re: 3500 Watertown Road Subdivision <br />File No. 000139-05000-0 <br />Plat No. 05-3152 <br />Dear Mike, <br />We have reviewed the revised plans and preliminary plat dated 11-14-05 for the proposed 6-lot <br />subdivision located at 3500 Watertown Road. The proposed improvements include grading, roadway <br />construction and storm sewer improvements to serve the site. We have the following comments with <br />regards to engineering matters; <br />• The plat should show 5-foot drainage and utility easements along all interior lot lines and <br />10-foot drainage and utility easements along all right-of-way frontages and exterior lot lines. <br />• Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all ponding areas, drainage ways <br />and wetlands. <br />• All storm sewers proposed outside of the right-of-way should have drainage and utility <br />easements centered over the pipe. The easement should be a minimum of 10-feet in width <br />and may need to be wider if the pipe is deeper than 5-feet Access easements should be <br />provided to alt structures and storm sewer facilities outside of the right-of-way. <br />• The storm sewer design should be revised so that only one pipe conveys flows to the outlet <br />structure. The proposed pipe between CB-2 and STMH-I should be eliminated and a pipe <br />constructed between CB-2 and CB-7. An additional catch basin should be provided on the <br />west side of the road across the street from CB-7. <br />• Final plans should include plan and profile views of all proposed storm sewers. <br />• Final plans should include a drainage area map, ponding calculations and storm sewer <br />calculations. The pond design must meet NURP standards. <br />• Proposed elevations shown east of the road and west of the pond appear to be incorrectly <br />stated by lO-fcet. The grading plan should be revised so the proposed elevations are shown <br />correctly. <br />• The proposed retaining wall shown east of the roadway near Watertown Road is at least 6- <br />feet high in some locations. All retaining walls that exceed 4-fcct in height or two tiered <br />walls that are not separated by a distance of at least two times the height of the wall require <br />a separate engineered design and detail submittal. Final plans should specify proposed wall <br />materials. <br />• The plans show that the road construction will impact an existing wetland. It appears that <br />St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN ■ Milwaukee. Wl • Chicago, IL <br />Alfimiallv* Actlon/BqM«l Op^riimlijf fniplo)f*r untf fmployct Owned