My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W" ' — <br />I •f <br />I <br />1 <br />■i <br />! <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 21,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />2. Submittal of suitable landscape plans, tree preservation and augmentation plans showin^; how <br />3. <br />development of the site can meet the City ’s Conservation Design goals. <br />Submittal of written confirmation that MCWD wi'.l accept the 2000 square feet wetls nd <br />filling as proposed for Lot 8. <br />Gaflion indicated the applicant has only recently submitted recommendations from Appliec Ecological <br />Services dated November 18,2005, with regards to Conservation Design. Staff has only had a chance to <br />briefly review this material prior to tonight’s meeting. <br />Bohl stated he met with Shardlow & Associates regarding the Rural Oasis corridor and Conservation <br />Plan. Bohl indicated he has submitted the results of the meeting with Doug Mensing, AES, who has <br />written a letter outlining his recommendations for the site. <br />Bohl stated the AES classified the site, which historically has been used for farming, as degraded, and that <br />ecologically the site, especially Ouilot B, can be improved by bringing some of the native plantings back <br />on the site. Bohl indicated the recommendations of the Park Commission would also be incorporated into <br />the plan. <br />Rahn inquired whether the applicant is receptive with the recommendations from AES. <br />Bohl stated he is and that they would be incorporating the AES’s recommendations into the landscape <br />plan. <br />Rahn inquired whether the applicant has received a letter from the Walerslied District approving the fill, <br />E 'hi stated they are requ’rcd to have preliminary plat approval prior to going before the Watershed <br />District. <br />Gaffron stated he has indicated to the applicant that he would be willing to speak with the Watershed <br />District regarding this application and would make the request that the MCWD make some preliminary <br />findings on the fill. <br />Bohl indicated he did receive an e-mail from the MCWD stating they were allowed up to the maximum of <br />2000 feet of fill on the prior plan. <br />PAGE 3 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.