Laserfiche WebLink
f * <br />IVUNUTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 21,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Gafiron stated the applicant has submitted a revised Wetland Delineation Report, which indicates that the <br />portions of the road ditch along Willow Drive are incidental wetland; i.e., areas of wetland created solely <br />as a result of actions by public or private entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating the <br />wetland. The applicants are requesting that MCWD declare this portion of wetland as incidental and not <br />subject to a replacement plan. <br />The City’s wetland consultant, John Smyth, reviewed the plans to determine the potential impacts of the <br />proposed wetland filling and to determine if there were options to rearrange lot lines to avoid the need to <br />for wetland buffer setback variances on Lots 7 and 8. Smyth concluded that the City should support a <br />potential revision to the classification of the wetland along the Willow Drive frontage of Lot 10, allowing <br />the lot lines for Lots 8,9, and 10 to shift westward. This could potentially allow for reductions, instead of <br />increases, to the fill in the wetland in Lot 8, which is considered by the City’s consultant to be a more <br />valuable wetland to protect than that in Lot 10 along Willow Drive. <br />Gaffron stated the applicant and staff met with Adam Arvidson, landscape architect with DSU, on <br />November T*" to review the Rural Oasis study and its applicability to this site. Gaffron noted Arvidson’s <br />comments are included within the commissioners’ packets. <br />The Park Commission has reviewed this plan on November 7*^ and is recommending that the trail <br />connection along the private road and through the church property to Glendale Drive be a public <br />pedestrian and bike trail. Gaffron noted the Pa>k Commission did not discuss further the issue of <br />potential wetland conflicts with the trail easements requested along the entire Willow Drive frontage of <br />the plat. The Planning Commission had concluded on October 17"' that the combination of Outlot B and <br />the proposed trail connection to Glendale would satisfy the RPUD 10 percent private recreation area <br />requirement, with no park fee reimbursement for either of these elements, even though the trail through <br />the church property will be public. <br />The Planning Commission should consider the following issues: <br />1. Inclusion of a 10-foot trail easement along the west boundary of the entire property. <br />PAGE 2 <br />__J