11-14-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Date Appikatioa Received: 9-21-OS Date Application Considered as Complete: 9-21-05 120-Day Review Period Expires: 11-20-05 COUNCIL MEETING NOV 1 42005 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION OTYOFORONO Date: November 8,2005 Item No. Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Title: Planning Director inuirHior <Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #05-3160 Judson M. Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Rd. S. • Subdivision: Lot Line Rearrangement & Driveway Easement - Resolution Application Summary: The applicant proposes to combine and re-arrange the lot lines among three existing tax parcels to result in just two tax parcels. The intent is to 1) combine the two smaller parcels into one 5-acre building site; 2) then rearrange the lot line between this combination and the 21-acre parcel to straighten out that common lot line; and 3) formalize a driveway easement through the 21-acre parcel out to Old Crystal Bay Road to serve the 5-acre parcel. List of Exhibits A - Resolution B - Surv^ C - Propo^ Driveway Easement Document D - Notice of Council Action 10-26-05 E - Memo and Selected Exhibits of 10-20-05 Council reviewed this request on October 24 and tabled the request to allow applicant to provide a draft driveway easement for review and consideration on November 14. Council indicated no problem with the layout, but acknowledged the City Attorney’s concerns regarding the driveway easement language having potential impacts on future subdivision of the large parcel, and suggested that applicant ’s attorney provide easement language with respect to such concerns. The propos^ driveway easement is attached as Exhibit C. The City Attorney has reviewed this easement and finds it acceptable. If Council finds the driveway easement language acceptable, the attached resolution approving the lot line rearrangement can be adopted. The resolution contains specific findings as to why this lot line rearrangement is not required to be a plat. It also documents that this lot line rearrangement does us! constitute a subdivision that would trigger expiration of the existing bam caretaker apartment as granted in Resolution No. 3072; does not affect the area of property associated with the horse bam which was granted an Oversize Accessory Structure CUP in Resolution No. 3072; and does not require the removal of existing structures within the property. COUNOL ACTION REQUESTED Review the proposed resolution and driveway easement language, and if both are acceptable, adopt the resolution. -