Laserfiche WebLink
monuments are now formally regulated by ordinance and that the monuments themselves can be <br />eight feet in height, allowing the gates existing between the monuments to approach a height greater <br />than 42" may be reasonable. <br />NAMEPLATE SIGNAGE <br />Staff also is somewhat concerned with the signage proposed on th« gates being: “Living Waters Est. <br />2004". The sign ordinance permits a nameplate of two square feet with a nameplate defined as “any <br />sign Mliich the name or address or both of the business or occupant of the lot where the sign i^ <br />placed or may be a directory listing the names, addresses and business of occupants." The ^>plicant <br />has the signage is to marie the name of the estate. This technically isn’t permitted per the sign <br />code and staff would like clarification fiom the Council of whether estate names are acceptable. A <br />review of the gates existing in the community yielded existence of few, if any, gates with signage of <br />anything other than an address or resident name. The signage proposed complies with the two <br />square foot limitation. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Direct staff on the acceptable gate height and signage content. This may include a specific <br />interpretation of the ordinimee and/or include a revision to the ordinance for future clarification. <br />.V <br />J