My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 12:30:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />r_ <br />Il <br />'O' I ^ '** <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 19,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Rahn asked for public comment. <br />Gladys McClennan, Woodsland Group Home, stated she has questions regarding the pond, noting that she <br />does house six developmentally disabled adults and that she has a concern regarding the safety of those <br />people. McClennan stated there currently is a dilapidated fence between the two properties and that she <br />was wondering whether that fence would need to be replaced. <br />Paul Phillips, President of Woodslaiid Group Home, indicated he is a neighbor of the church on the west <br />side and that he has concerns regarding the lighting and ponding. Phillips inquired where the cuirent <br />driveway is located and whether it would remain the same. <br />Gundlach stated die driveway would remain the same. <br />Phillips indicated he drives that route every day and that he periodically turns into the church parking lot <br />for safety reasons if a large truck is tailgating him. Phillips inquired whether that would be an option in <br />the future. Phillips stated he also has a concern with the lighting and that he would prefer it remain as it <br />currently is. Phillips noted there are bedrooms located adjacent to the parking lot. <br />Rahn inquired whether the city has any specifics regarding the ponding to be constructed on the site. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant was not aware that the City Engineer has recommended that the pond meet <br />NURP standards. <br />Thiesse indicated he was told initially that it would be rate controlled and that the pond would be diy at <br />times. Thiesse stated the pond was never meant to be a quality treatment pond and that he was only <br />informed today that a NURP pond is required. Thiesse stated a NURP pond requires tour-feet of water <br />standing at all times, which he is opposed to due to the liability issues it creates. Thiesse indicated he <br />would like to discuss that issue with the City Engineer. <br />Rahn stated the application could be moved forward with liiu stipulation that that issue be resolved with <br />the City Engineer. Rahn commented that perhaps the fence should be repaired. <br />PAGE 37
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.