Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Moaday« September 19,2005 <br />6:00 o*clock p.m. <br />Gundlach indicated there are three entrance points shown on the proposed plan, with the main entrance <br />facing Sixth Avenue North and two sec ondary entrances off the parking lot, which face east. Staff does <br />not anticipate that any new building mounted lighting would be near enougli to the adjacent residential <br />property to cause any negative impacts. Should the applicant decide to add parking lot lighting in the <br />future, an additional conditional use permit must be reviewed and approved. <br />The applicant is not proposing any new signage as part of this proposal. The applicant has also indicated <br />they are in compliance with the 30-foot height limitation, with a proposed height of 27 to 28 feet. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan illustrating how the expanded <br />parking and rate control pond will impact the existing topography. The City Engineer ’s preliminary <br />comments are included in the Planning Cr.nmission packets. Gundlach noted the City Engineer is <br />recommending that the pond be modified to include water quality treatment for the entire site and should <br />satisfy NURP requirements. <br />The nearest adjacent propetty* to this site is to !he west at a distance of approximately 250 feet. Tliis site <br />is a group home and would not be negatively impacted by the proposed expansion as most of the <br />improvements are on the ea«t side of the property. Staff also does not foresee any negative impacts to the <br />properties to the east or south. <br />Staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit subject to the recommendations of the <br />City Engineer and further subject to the following conditions; <br />1. The Planning Commission should determine if a viable hardship existe to allow the expanded <br />parking in the southwest comer of the site as a front yard parking setback variaitce would be required. <br />2. Prior to City Council review of the application, revised plans must be submitted incorporating the <br />preliminary recommendations of the City Engineer. The applicant will also be required to comply with <br />any other forthcoming comments from the City Engineer. <br />Thieaie had nothing to add to StafTs report S <br />PAGE 36 <br />—, <br />6 <br />i <br />t <br />i