My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 12:30:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
it <br />MS-3121 Narrows Saloon Expansion <br />October 6,200S <br />Page 4 <br />The possible regional draw of the entertainment aspects of the expanded use should be <br />considered in determining whether the proposed use has the potential to become <br />incompatible with the City’s goals for Navarre or with the surrounding residential <br />development. Council should consider whether the expansion may push the size or <br />magnitude of the use beyond the scale that is compatible with the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br />3. Consistency with Zoning Code Standards. <br />a) Lot Standards. <br />1) Lot Area. The lot area at 13,656 s.f. is short of the required 20,000 s.f. for <br />a building lot in the B-1 District. Because the building is existing, a lot <br />area variance is not required. <br />Lot Width. The existing lot width of 112* is conforming with the B-1 100 ’ <br />minimum. <br />Setbacks. The existing building does not meet the B-1 setback standards <br />for fix>nt or side setbacks. These setbacks are not proposed to change, and <br />do not require a variance. The proposed rear vestibule addition meets the <br />required IS’ side and 35’ rear setbacks, hence no variance is required. The <br />proposed outside seating area at the rear of the building will be enclosed <br />by fencing, is not considered part of the building for setback purposes, and <br />no variance is required. <br />Required Yards. The existing building does not meet the B-1 ‘front yard’ <br />requirement of 20 ’, but no change is proposed other than to potentially fill <br />in the existing entryway indents to be flush with the remainder of the front <br />facade. This does not require a variance. The existing building and <br />proposed rear vestibule addition meet the 30’ rear yard requirement, and <br />the proposed 5’-6 ’ fence and plantings do not constitute an encroachment <br />on the rear yard, hence no variance is required. <br />Hardcover . The site is in the 500-100 ’ hardcover zone and contains <br />virtually 100% hardcover. The proposed bermed planting area abutting the <br />outdoor seating has the potential to reduce hardcover by approximately <br />150 s.f. or down to 98.^. No new hardcover is being added, but the <br />vestibule converts 88 s.f. of pavement to structure. <br />Lot Coveraite bv Structures. Existing lot coverage by structures is <br />approximately 5,266 s.f. (38.6%) where only 15% is allowed for any lot <br />less than 2 acres in area. The 88 s.f. rear vestibule increases structural <br />coverage to 5,354 s.f. (39.2%) This is a minor increase that technically <br />requires a variance. The only apparent hardship or justification for the <br />increase, is that creating an internal vestibule to contain sound and for <br />energy efficiency, takes space out of the existing floor plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.