Laserfiche WebLink
-'i <br />fM-31IS WJMProiKrtlctLLC <br />Page 33 <br />Lighting fbr the parking area is proposed to be a continuation of the ^proved lighting plan. <br />This is acceptable and is expected to have no impacts on adjoining residential properties which <br />are all mote than 600' distant fiom the parking area. <br />Mo additional signage is proposed with this building addition. <br />Engineering Concerns. The project has be«i reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments <br />are attached as Exhibit F. His comments relate generally to drainage and stormwater runoff <br />concerns associated with the parking lot expansion. While the site is not in the Shoreland <br />District and not subject to hardcover regulations, applicant will be required to provide drainage <br />calculations and additional grading and stormwater managemoit detail to satisfy tlie City’s <br />drainage concerns as idoitified by the City Engineer. Planning Commission approval should be <br />subiect to approval of final plans bv the City Engineer prior to final Council action. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Should the 5,000 s.f. addition to the 1,875 s.f. existing detachv. garage be required to <br />conform to the exterior finish of the principal building? <br />Are there any other specific concerns with the proposed garage and parking lot addition? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval subject to Planning Commission's determination as to whether the <br />proposed 5,000 s.f. addition should be finished to match the principal b uilding, and subject to <br />approval of final gradmg and drainage plans by the City Engineer prior to final Council action. <br />>■4 ' -■ <br />%> <br />■ - ^ ■■■ V - ^ <br />-i ■ > =' * S--:-v ^ <br />t <br />\ <br />I