Laserfiche WebLink
IrOv'.' <br />K*tM <br />W5-311SWJM!ropertlM <br />Septenbcr 14,200S <br />P»|02 <br />Items for Consideration <br />1. Will the 5,000 s.f. new building and the 1,875 s.f. existing detached garage still be <br />required to have matching facade materials/colors? The intent of that condition was to <br />.gain consistency of appearance; the proposed concrete panel construction introduces yet <br />a third facade style, different than that of the primary building on the site and different <br />than that of the existing garage... <br />2. While a new site plan has not been submitted, stafTs understanding is that save for a 10* <br />westerly offeet to separate the new building from the existing garage, the pavement plan <br />remains generally the same as the plan reviewed in July... <br />3. Ate there any other specific concerns with the proposed garage and parking lot addition? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Applicant has yet to provide a revised grading/drainage plan for City Engineer review and <br />approval, which is required before the parking lot and builidng plan will be forwarded to Council <br />for ajqnoval. Subject to PC’s determination wiiether or how the fecade materials of the existing <br />garage should be revised to match the proposed new garage, staff recommends approval per the <br />following conditions: <br />1.Facades of the new SO’xl 00* accessory building and existing accessory building shall be <br />of matching materials (or textures?) and colors. <br />2. Final grading and drainage plans shall be submitted for review and approval by City <br />Engineer prior to Council action.