Laserfiche WebLink
rr• I <br />r' <br />11 <br />.1 <br />MS-31 IS WJM Properties <br />SepteMber 14, IMS <br />P0|e2 <br />■ A <br />Items for Considoration <br />1. Will the S,000 s.f. new building and the 1,875 s.f. existing detached garage still be <br />required to have nuitching facade materials/colors? The intent of that condition was to <br />.gain consistency of appearance; the proposed concrete panel construction introduces yet <br />a third fiicade style, different than that of the primary building on the site and different <br />than that of the existing garage... <br />2.While a new site plan has not been submitted, staffs understanding is that save for a 10 ’ <br />westerly ofbet tc separate the new building from the existing garage, the pavement plan <br />remains generally the same as the plan reviewed in July... <br />3. Are there any other specific concerns with the proposed garage and parking lot addition? <br />Staff Recommondatioii <br />Aj^licant has yet to provide a revised grading/drainage plan for City Engineer review and <br />aj^roval, which is required before the parking lot and builidng plan will be forwarded to Council <br />qiproval. Subject to PC’s determination whether or how the facade materials of the existing <br />garage should be revised to match the proposed new garage, staff recommends approval per the <br />following conditions: <br />1.Facades of the new SO’xlOO* accessory building and existing accessory building shall be <br />of matching materials (or textures?) and colors. <br />2.Fiiud grading *:nd draiiuige plans shall be submitted for review and approval by City <br />Engineer prior to Council action. <br />fl <br />o'^ <br />A'j