Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #05-3091 <br />31MafCh200S <br />Pegs 4 of 4 <br />MkaH rtcammtml afpntml ttify when H b demo$u tnitd tk»t mck tdhiu wNt be /w ketplng wM Ike <br />ipIrileiKlbiliibeftkeOntieZoHliigCe^e, <br />Staffs conclusion is that the impacts of the very minor side setback encroachment are <br />minimal, and that the deck is in a location that is as conforming a location as can be <br />found on this very limited site. <br />issnes for CoasMcnitioo <br />■ Planning Commission should address any concerns expressed by the neighbors. <br />■ Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff RecomnseadatioB <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the after-the-fact side yard and lake setback <br />variances for the rooftop deck. A building permit must be obtained for the deck. <br />1^^ <br />^ '■1%' <br />* i <br />Ns,-, <br />- Uw.- V <br />i' V'''.‘'r-^ <br />-X'*.W <br />r?i.H'id {. i . .C.V I <br />X Ife mi <br />*.• <br />. ■ <br />. ■ ■ ^ • 4'^ • ■ -t' <br />•v'* <br />I