Laserfiche WebLink
FILEiOS-3133 <br />30 June 2005 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />applicants wanted to rebuild their home, however, preferred to wait until Birch Lane ’s <br />stormwater drainage issues were resolved by the City. Those issues were resolved over <br />the winter of 2004-2005 with the installation of curb and gutter to manage the stormwater <br />drainage. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot Area/Wkith; <br />LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. (O.Sacte)100 ’ <br />Actual 9,568 s.f. (0.22 acre)50’ <br />Setbacks; <br />Structural Coverage; <br />Hardcover Calculations; <br />LR-IC Required Existing Proposed <br />Lake 75’156 ’(house)No change <br />Rear 30 ’14 ’16 ’ <br />East Side 10 ’10.4 ’ (house)No change <br />West Side 10 ’3.7’3.7’ <br />Average Lakeshore The detached garage will be located behind the average lakeshore <br />setback line. <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />9,568 s.f. (0.22 acre)Allowed: 1,500 s.f. (15.6%) <br />Previously Approved: (Resol. No. 4274) 1,721 s.f. (18%) <br />Proposed: 1,750 s.f. (18.2%) <br />Hanicover <br />Zone <br />Total Area <br />laZoae <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Haidcover <br />Approved <br />Hardcover <br />Resol. 4274 <br />0-75 2,163 s.f Os.f <br />(0%) <br />35 s.f* <br />(2%) <br />35 s.f <br />(2%) <br />75-250 6,662 s.f 1,665.5 s.f <br />(25%) <br />1,981 s.f* <br />(29.7%) <br />2,055 s.f <br />(30.8%) <br />2,012 s.f <br />(30.2%) <br />250 - 500 743 s.f 223 s.f <br />(30%) <br />356 s.f * <br />(48%) <br />311 s.f <br />(42%) <br />344 s.f <br />(46.3%) <br />♦ After exc usion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />ConditioBal Use Permit Analysis <br />The applicants ’ property is considered a through-lot. Construction of an accessory <br />structure on through-lot must either meet the principal stnicture setback, qualifying for an <br />administrative approval, or requires a conditional use permit. There is no way to locate