Laserfiche WebLink
#05-3132 <br />July IS, 2005 <br />Page 6 of6 <br />the City Engineer had no other issues or requested revisions to the grading plan. Because <br />there is no land alteration activity within 26’ of the wetland, the lot is not subject to the <br />wetland moratorium. <br />lasses fsr CossMcratioo <br />1. Does the proposed grading plan w/fill create any negative impacts? <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recomaicadation <br />Staff recommends apjnoval of the lot area variance stipulating that the deck on the lake <br />side of the home be confirmed to meet a 30’ setback from the side lot line, as no side yard <br />setback variance would be granted, and also that the chain link fence shown within 75* of <br />the lake, within the q)plicant’s property, be removed. <br />With regards to the requested conditioiud use permit for fill in excess of 500 cubic yards, <br />the Planning Commission should review the ^plicable Zoning Code Sections and <br />evaluation criteria in Section 78-1250 and determine if any negative impacts will result <br />P' <br />^5 <br />■ I • <br />mi <br />•"ji <br />'■•'i <br />• - 1 I