Laserfiche WebLink
i: <br />Date Appikatioii Received: 6-22-05 <br />Date Applicatioii CoMidcred as Complete: 7-12-05 <br />64^Day Review Period Eipircs: 9-10^ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />COUNCIL MEcTING <br />AUG 222005 <br />CfTYOFORONO <br />Date: August 4,2005 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ <br />Title: City Planner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #05-3129, Ascent Investments, Inc. on behalf of Douglas Klint <br />1345 Rest Point Lane - Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Ut Width: <br />LR- IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ( I arce min.) <br />0.44 acres (18,994 s.f.) <br />54 ’ @ shoreline; 76’ @ 75 ’ setback (140 ’ required) <br />ListofEihibits <br />A - Notice of PC Action dated 7-19-05 <br />B - Draft PC Minutes of 7-18-05 <br />C - PC Memo and Exhibits of 7-14-05 <br />Appiicadon Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a new <br />residence on an existing lot: <br />1. Lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 0.44 acres in <br />area wdien 1.0 acres is normally required. <br />2. Lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 54 ’ in <br />width at the shoreline and 76’ in width at the 75 ’ setback when 140 ’ is normally required. <br />3. Side street setback variance to permit a setback of 23’ when 35 ’ is normally required and <br />3’ currently exists. <br />Plaaaiag Commiuion Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to approve the lot area and width variances but to deny the side <br />street setback variance based on the lot containing adequate buildable area within the required <br />setbacks. The dissenting Commissioner felt the uniqueness of the amount of undeveloped ri^t-of- <br />way adjacent to the lot provided for a hardship to approve some level of side street setback variance. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Stair s recommendation is concurrent with the Planning Commission recommendation noted above. <br />No hardship inherent to the applicant ’s property exists to warrant a side street setback variance for a <br />new home that could be re-configured to not require variances beyond lot area and lot width.