My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:57:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />Exhibit D <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 25,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />4. (W5-3104 DAVm AND RENEE MACK, 1978 SHADYWOOD ROAD- <br />VARIANCE <br />Curtis explained that the applicants submitted a revised proposal to the Planning Commission and <br />are requesting a number of variances in order remove a detached garage, construct a garage <br />attach^ to the house, footprint additions to the house, and a 2”* stoiy addition over the house and <br />the new attached garage, llie Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the lake <br />setback variance for a 2"^ story addition above the existing footprint; a hardrover variance within <br />the 0-7S’ zone for 25% hardcover; a hardcover variance within the 7S’-2S0’ zone to allow an <br />attached garage; and additions not to exceed the existing level (16%) of structural coverage, while <br />reducing the proposed driveway hardcover (eliminate the turn around loop). Though the <br />applicants have submitted a revised plan, the plans still require a structural coverage variance for <br />11% where 16% currently exists. Curtis stat^ that the Planning Staff continues to recommend <br />denial of the structural coverage variance in order to expand the house footprint square footage. <br />Sansevere stated that he was having difficulty finding a hardship to warrant 18%. <br />Mr. Mack stated that the size of the lot was his hardship. At lOO’XlOO’, the lot was not too deep <br />or wide. <br />The applicants’ sirehitect stated that they had scaled back the garage to get closer to the structural <br />coverage limitation. <br />Gaffion noted that the 2% difference in structural coverage amounted to roughly 280 s.f <br />Murphy stated that he found it difficult to find a hardship to support the variance. He urged the <br />applicant to build a small house to fit the small lot. <br />Mack stated that his neighbor near the channel had recently been granted a variance to build a <br />20X22’ detached garage near the channel. <br />McMillan stated that the current structural cover is 16%, noting that the additions to the house <br />and garage have brought it to 18%. <br />Sansevere suggested the applicant have his architect redesign the house to meet the 16% <br />structural cover. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that the applicants options would be to table for redesign with an extension <br />or denial of the application which would mean a wait of 6 months to resubmit. <br />Mack asked to be tabled in order to redesign and return. <br />Sansevere arevcd. White seconded, to tnMe Applkntion #05-3184,1978 Shadywood Road, <br />for the gorpoae of rodsaign with a signed extension. VOTE: Ayes 5, nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.