My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
08-08-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:39:55 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:15:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Moaday, July 18,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />the property, causing the property to be considerably out of conformance with zoning regulations. The <br />applicant is proposing to remove her existing detached garage and attach a slightly smaller garage to the <br />home with living space above. <br />The applicant is requesting the following variances: <br />1. A 0-7S’zone hardcover variance for 32.9 percent hardcover where 0 percent is normally allowed <br />and 32.6 percent currently exists. <br />2. A 75 ’•250* setback hardcover variance for 29.5 percent hardcover where 25 percent is normally <br />allowed and 31.4 percent currently exists. <br />3.A lake setback variance. <br />4. A structural coverage variance for 21 percent structural coverage where 15 percent is allowed and <br />21.5 percent currently exists. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the lake setback variance and approval of some level of <br />hardcover and structural coverage variances as the Planning Commission deems appropriate. <br />Dan Larkin stated there will be some further hardcover reductions that are not depicted on the survey, <br />including removal of a brick sidewalk and two retaining walls. <br />Larkin staled he did speak with one of the adjoining neighbors regarding the impact on his view to the <br />lake, and after showing him the plans, he has indicated that he is not opposed to the project. <br />Larkin stated the boulder wall could also be removed, which is not depicted on the survey. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Fritzler stated he would like to see some more consideration given to reducing the hardcover. Fritzler <br />inquired whether the hardcover in the 75’-250’ zone could be reduced further. <br />Curtis stated the brick walk would also be removed. <br />Larkin concurred that the brick walk would be removed and the garage door would be offset, which <br />would reduce the driveway somewhat. <br />Rahn inquired whether the dormer depicted in the proposal would be living space. <br />PAGE 39 J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.