Laserfiche WebLink
ri. <br />i- <br />I: <br />n <br />i'i <br />Date Applkation Received: 6-22-05 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-12-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-10-05 <br />CnUM/*^!i RirrxifsjQ <br />AUG 8 2005 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY OF OHOjmo <br />'»(. > <br />Date: August 4,2005 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval:Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ <br />Title: City Planner <br />Agenda Seetion: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #05-3129, Ascent Investments, Inc. on behalf of Douglas Klint <br />1345 Rest Point Lane - Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ( I arce min.) <br />0.44 acres (18,994 s.f.) <br />54’ @ shoreline; 76’ @ 75’ setback (140’ required) <br />List of Exhibits <br />A -Notice of PC Action dated 7-19-05 <br />B - Draft PC Minutes of 7-18-05 <br />C-PC Memo and Exhibits of 7-14-05 <br />AppUcMthn Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a new <br />residence or. an existing lot: <br />1. Lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 0.44 acres in <br />area udien 1.0 acres is normally required. <br />2. Lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 54’ in <br />width at the shoreline and 76’ in width at the 75’ setback when 140’ is normally required. <br />3. Side street setbadc variance to permit a setback of 23’ when 35’ is normally required and <br />3 ’ currently exists. <br />naaniig Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to approve the lot area and width variances but to deny the side <br />street setback variance based on the lot containing adequate buildable area within the required <br />setbacks. The dissenting Commissioner felt the uniqueness of the amount of undeveloped right-of- <br />way adjacent to the lot ]wovided for a hardship to approve some level of side street setback variance. <br />Staff Rocommondation <br />StafiTs recommendation is concurrent with the Planning Conunission recommendation noted above. <br />No hardship inherent to the applicant’s property exists to warrant a side: tieet setback variance for a <br />new home that could be re-configured to not require variances beyond lot area and lot width.