My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 27,2005 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />6. M05-SI00 Lmnymni Sheryl Palm, 1146 WUdhuntTrmU,ContiHuei <br />Murphy moved. White seconded, to accc|it RESOLUTION NO. 5341, A Resolution granting lot area and <br />lot width vnrianccs, and a conditional use permit with the provision that the four conditions have been met <br />and that Krccning plans for the retaining walb be subject to staff approval. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Mayor <br />rcteriOB diitCBtiBg, <br />Mayor Peterson felt the design was too much house for the lot size. <br />7. 1105-3110 Thomas and Sheila Browne, 760 Brown Road South - Variance - Resolution No. 5342 <br />^tc moved, McMillan seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5342, a Resolution approving the lake <br />^Mk variance in order to construct a V* story dormer and denying bke setback and hardcover variances <br />In order to construct a garage addition. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />8. 805-3111 Water Street Homes, LLC on behalf of Randall and Sara Hogan, 2260 Fox Street- <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variances - Resolution No. 5343 <br />McMillan questioned whether the wetland calculation was included in the redesigned site plan. <br />Oaflron pointed out that code does not state whether or not you use wetland for oversize accessory space <br />calculaUoiu. He stated that the argument could be made that, if one considers wetland open space, one should get <br />errat for it, but since the code is not spediic and lot area typically does not include wetland in its overall <br />calcuutions it is unclear depending how you look at wetland. <br />determined in a previous meeting that the driveway outlot was to be <br />Ga^ concl^ that if the ouUot and wetland were added together, as determined in the previous meeting, the <br />ipplicint would be close to meeting accessory building size restrictions. <br />McMillan suggested that item #5 in the Resolution be removed as it was redundant. <br />” ** '« ""courag. o O kt buikteis to <br />f. MS-3114 Boyer on behMfofSever and Sharon Prterson, 3145 North Shore Drive-Variances- Resolution No. 5344 <br />Page9of 12 <br />u <br />I;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.