My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />II MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 27,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />6. W5-3100 Larry and Sheryl Palm, 1146 WUdbunt Trail - Variance - Resolution No. 5341 <br />Gundlach explained that the applicant requested lot area and lot width, and a conditional use permit to construct a <br />new residence on an existing lot and allow the retaining walls and grading within 5’ of a lot line. She noted that <br />staff c^uis wiA the Planning Commission recommendation for approval as long as the grading plan meets the 4 <br />conditions as laid out by the Plaiuiing Commission. <br />'Hiou^ he noted the structure meets hardcover and structural cover requirements, White commented that the <br />drainage and wall systems leap out at him. <br />Gundlach stated that the applicant has verified that the amount of drainage can be handled by this design. <br />Vang a^OMhed the Council and explained that, thou^ it is not a great amount of water but the speed at which it <br />movm t^ IS of concern and being addressed by this drainage plan. He maintained that slowing the water before it <br />hits the lou^ flat area at the water ’s edge is of greatest concern. In an effort to catch and direct the water down <br />toward the bottom of a funnel swale system instead of the neighbor’s property, Vang felt this to be an effective <br />system. <br />Murphy suted that he had never seen a wall which goes across property lines even with a letter of agreement <br />between two neighbors. <br />Vang noted that fliis perpendicular wall crossing both properties would benefit both homeowners. <br />McMillan asked if Vang ’s earlier concerns regarding drainage had been addressed by this design. <br />Vang stated that this particular house design was driving the need for the walls to handle the drainage. <br />**** Council to view and suggested that landscaping be <br />Pata stat ed that, since the grade falls off quickly, and the need to direct drainage requires walls, they used two <br />J^wentmater^ to break up the concrete expanse. He noted that he would be putting together a landscape plan <br />White stated that if he were the neighbor, he too, would want the walls to help direct runoff. <br />The neighbors stood and stated that they did want the retaining wall system as proposed. <br />Mayor Peterson Mted that she would have preferred the home be scaled back to accommodate the runoff rathi <br />tlum creatmg a dramatic runoff system to handle the flow. <br />Vang eapb^ that runoff has ^ a problem, due to the topography of the neighborhood, not just this proposed <br />proposed grading plan the construction will help out <br />me nagnoon ntnoff problem and not increase it in any way. <br />Palm pointed out that all of the water to the north of their properties runs down their lots. <br />Pages of 12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.