07-11-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MS-3fl2 Juac 20.200S Page I of 3 Date AppHcatioa Received: 4-2(Mi5 Date AppHcatioa Considered as Complete: 5-4-05 60-Day Review Period Expires: 7-3-05 To:Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator From: Date: Janice Gundlach, City Planner^ JunelS.200S Sabjcct:OS-3112, Lx)ren & Stacey Schoenzeit, 4480 Forest Lake Landing, Lot Line Re-Arrangement, Rear/Street Yard Setback Variance, Hardcover Variance, Public Hearing Continuation Zoaiag Dtotrict: Lot Area: Lot Width: LR- IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (Iacre min.) 0.33 acre (14,489 s.f.) 58’ @ shoreline; 45.5’ @ 75’ setback ApptlcatloH Summary (revised request): Applicant requests the following in order to construct additions onto the existing footprint and to remodel the existing residence; 1. Lot line re-arrangement with 1090 Wildhurst Trail whereby a land exchange would result in two non-conforming area and width lots to remain non-conforming in area and width. 2. Rear/Street yard setback variance to permit a setback of approximately 8’ when 30’ is normally required and 8’ currently exists. 3. Hardcover.' variance to permit 60% hardcover within the 250’-500’ zone where 30% is normally allowed and 54.9% currently exists (percentages based on post-lot line re- _____arrangement zone areas). Stqff Mecommeudattou: Staff recommends approval of the revised application pending the following: 1. Submittal of a favorable engineering report regarding the existing foundation and its ability to withstand the proposed improvements. 2. Dedication of a 20 ’ sewer easement centered over the existing sewer lines. This easement should be dedicated by both owners (1090 Wildhurst Trail and 4480 Forest Lake Landing). Staff is willing to negotiate the language of the easement to protect existing encroachments and other potential interests. 3. Dedication of a 5’ drainage and utility easement, by both property owners, to exist on each side of the reviscu common lot line. The Planning Commission may want to consider whether a lake yard deck off the main level of the home should be included, and also whether a secondary recommendation can be made should the engineering report on the existing foundation be unfavorable. Exhibits Exhibit A — Notice of Planning Commission Action dated 5-17-05 Exhibit B - Applicant Memo dated 6-10-05 Exhibit C — Revised Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Exhibit D - Revised Survey Exhibit E - City Engineer Comments dated 5-26-05 i