My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ms-3120 <br />Jam 20,2005 <br />Pag* 3 of 3 <br />Hardship Aaalysii <br />/a CMuHtHmg apptkttkuu J, r vmrtaMet, the Phnnhig Commbaltm shall consider the effect iff the <br />propotad earkmea upon the health, safely and weffare of the conununlty, existing and antklpaled <br />treffk eondUans, light and air, danger of fire, rbk to the pnblk sffety, and the fffeet on valnes of <br />properly In the snrronnding area. The Planning Connnlsslon shall consider reconunadhig approval <br />for vartances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Codebt Instances where thdr strict <br />erfforcement wontd cease nndne hardship hecanse iff etrcnmstances uniqne to the bnbvldnal <br />properly nnder conslderodon, and shall recommend a/^roval onfy when U Is deimmstrated that such <br />actions wUlhehi keeping wbh the spirit and Imeni of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds that due to the haidships of the high levels of traffic and high speeds existing <br />on Shoreline Drive adjacent to the applicant’s property, it is necessary to have a sign <br />greater than 12 s.f. in area in order for it to be recognizable. Also, it is typical that <br />religious institutions seek and obtain sign variances to display signs larger than 12 s.f. <br />because of visibility issues. Staff finds that the 61 s.f. sign proposed, while 1 s.f. larger <br />than existing sign, is acceptable as it will be a monument style and be visually more <br />appealing. Also, if you were to include the empty space between the two signs making <br />up the entire existing pylon sign, it would actually be larger in area than the proposed. <br />Staff also fiiKls that the hardcover variance requested is acceptable. The proposed <br />changes are minor and unclude a 32 s.f reduction. Also, there is no other hardcover that <br />could potentially be removed as the majority of it makes up building and parking area. <br />Issues far Consideration <br />1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this appliration? <br />Staff Recomnieadation <br />^iproval of the plan as submitted. <br />- V <br />j <br />J <br />1 ! <br />- <br />u
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.