My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on May 16, 2005 and recommended approval of lot width and <br />average lake setback variances based on the following findings: <br />a. The property has 44,610 s.f. (1.02 acre) in lot area and 109 ’ of lot <br />width at the shoreline and 123* at the 75 ’ setback. <br />b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicants to <br />make the property conforming in width. <br />c. A lagoon exists on the neighboring property to the north which <br />accounts for the home to the north to be set back considerably from the <br />applicant’s property, thus making an unnatural average lakeshore <br />setback line. <br />d. The applicants’ property contains a long shared driveway serving 4 <br />other residences, llie driveway and hardcover are entirely on the <br />applicants’ property and the hardcover is applied toward the 75 ’-250 ’ <br />hardcover allowance. This shared driveway situation would not be <br />allowed if the lots were subdivided today as an Outlot or a public road <br />would be required for this type of shared access. This shared driveway <br />configuration acts as a hardship that supports the 75 ’ - 250 ’ hardcover <br />variance for this complete rebuild situation. <br />e. The property is served with municipal sewer. <br />f. The property is similar in size to many of the lots in this neighborhood. <br />g. The average setback variance will have no impact on lake views <br />enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.