My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-13-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:49:00 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:13:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 16,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />addition to the 3S-foot buffer for any structure. GafTi%>n inquired whether this structure could be set <br />further back. <br />GafTron noted he would need to speak with the City Attorney on whether this structure and/or property <br />would fell under the wetland moratorium. <br />Carlson stated there are wetlands on both sides of the structure and that there would be issues if they are <br />required to tdd 20 feet on either side of the building. <br />Bremer suggested a condition of approval could be to insure that this structure does not fell under the <br />wetland moratorium. <br />Jurgens stated in his opinion it is important to know exactly where the wetland is located and suggested a <br />new delineation be completed. Jurgens inquired whether the survey is correct as it relates to the <br />elevations. Jurgens stated if the courtyard is at 950*, a considerable amount of fill would be required <br />around the structure. <br />Carlson stated the survey is accurate and that the overhead is merely an artist’s rendering. Carlson <br />pointed out they are constructing the structure into the grade. <br />Jim McNeil, Architect, indicated very little fill would be necessary. <br />Jurgens stated he would like to see that illustrated on the survey and a wetland delineation conducted. <br />Carlson stated the wetlands have not changed from the time the house was constructed. <br />Jurgens indicated he would also like some limitations placed on the car wash. <br />Carlson stated the car wash could drain into a holding tank to avoid runoff into the wetland or drainage to <br />the septic system. <br />Fritzler indicated he does not view this as a hardship given the size of the structure and that he has <br />concerns regarding the future use of this structure. Fritzler stated the property owner could store his <br />vehicles off site. Fritzler stated he has concerns with a portion of the structure being buried and that he <br />would prefer a structure that is not oversized. Fritzler inquired how the square footage of a lot is <br />determined.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.