Laserfiche WebLink
May 16,200S <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />number of problems, most notably water damage. The construction of a new building is <br />out of necessity, not an increase in congregation size or higher intensity of use. <br />The applicant has already obtained the necessary approvals from the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot Arca/Width <br />LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. ('/a acre)100’ <br />Actual 59,383 s.f. (1.36 acres)163.42 ’ <br />Setbacks: SO’ setbacks are required adjacent to all residentially zoned areas due to the <br />conditional use where 30* front and rear setbacks and 10’ side setbacks are normally <br />U12Required Existing Proposed <br />Front 50’68.5 ’51.5’ <br />Rear 50’235’220’ <br />Left Side (east)50’68.5 ’ building <br />47 ’ overhang <br />71 ’building <br />62 ’ overhang <br />Right Side (west)50’51.3’51’ <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />59383 s.f. (1.36 acres) <br />Allowed: 8,907.5 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 4,434 s.f (7.5%): contains <br />building footprint and drive up overhang <br />on east side of building <br />Hardcover Calculations: Almost the entire property is located within the 500’-1,000’ <br />lake setback zone, with the exception of the southwest comer of the property measuring <br />1,150 square feet in area. It is unknown how the ^licant came up with the property <br />area of the 500’-1,000’ zone shown on the worksheets, however staff has made the <br />necessary corrections, which puts the proposed hardcover percentage slightly higher than <br />originally thought. <br />1