Laserfiche WebLink
: * <br />fi <br />The ^jplicants have submitted a revised plan meeting the Planning Commission’s recommendation <br />regarding the walls but does not indicate the locations, if any, of the applicants ’ recommended <br />concurrent hardcover removals within the 0-75’ zone. A revised plan should be submitted indicating <br />where the 0-75’ zone hardcover will be removed to allow for the additional 134 s.f. of wall hardcover. <br />This plan has not been submitted. <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Although the 0-75’ hardcover removals required in the past were stipulations of resolutions which <br />have expired, staff feels that certain items of existing 0-75’ hardcover consisting of the 6 ’ wide gravel <br />path, 4.5 ’ X lO’shed, lakeside decks, and wooden platforms is excessive and uimecessary. As part of <br />the applicants ’ request for lakeside retaining walls the Planning Commission recommended that equal <br />portions of existing 0-75’ zone hardcover be removed to offset the additions in hardcover caused by <br />retaining walls. Staff would recommend perhaps a 2:1 or 3:1 removal of nonconforming hardcover. <br />The gravel path to the lake consists of 800 s.f. of hardcover, the shed is 45 s.f., and the decks at the <br />lake consist of 305 s.f. of hardcover. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution reflecting the Council’s action for approval at your May 23"* meeting. <br />•v. -Y • ’ -* <br />-:/*v. <br />‘. - - - ‘ <br />t <br />' n’' <br />^' ■■ *' <br />' i <br />1 <br />'=*4 •* <br />* '■ <br />vw-T’ I- • . <br />V* 1‘ . ... • .•v;; <br />* <br />-5