Laserfiche WebLink
ik <br />FILE #05-3091 <br />31 March 2005 <br />Pa0a4n(4 <br />skaH rtcommtml afp rova! oafy wkea h i» dtatoattraied that suck actions will oe In keying with the <br />ifMt anti Inlont of tka Orono Zoning Cotie. <br />StafTs conclusion is that the impacts of the very minor side setback encroachment are <br />minimalt and that the deck is in a location that is as conforming a location as can be <br />found on this very limited site. <br />IssMS for CouMcratioo <br />■ Planning Commission should address any concerns expressed by the neighbors. <br />■ Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff RecoMMeadatioB <br />Planning Staff recommends apinoval of the afler-the-fact side yard and lake setback <br />variances for the rooftop deck. A building permit must be obtained for the deck. <br />'W i <br />^.-*•••*•*»•**’.*- <br />% <br />-.rlv <br />■■■ <br />lliii <br />j <br />U. . V/ > <br />l.j» i'a <br />•5W' <br />f' <br />AJIK . 0 ■ ^ <br />JdH <br />- a <br />\ <br />t '