My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock pjn. <br />(005-3081 ZB ConitractioD, Inc., Continned) <br />OaffioD rtatffd before the Council toni^t is a resolution giving preliminaiy and final plat ^proval. <br />general development plan approval for PUD No. 4B, and PUD No. 4B Agreement and PUD/Development <br />Contract GafBron stated the City does require mylars prior to final plat approval, noting that the county <br />has not yet approved those. Gaffron further noted Oat release of this project would not happen until all <br />aspects of die project have been completed. <br />Qaffron noted the documents have been provided to the City Attorney for his review. <br />Barrett he does have a few minor comments but that there are no substantial changes to the <br />documents. <br />McMillan inquired whether Staff feels there are any issues that the Council should discuss. <br />Gafifron stated individuals would be purchasing and owning separate units, with a conunon interest <br />community plat being developed dud describes and creates the individual ownerships. Gaffron stated the <br />City is not involved in that aspect of this project Gaffron noted there would also be bylaws and <br />covenants for diis development, which the City would be reviewing. <br />recommended that potential purchasers be informed that there is a public works building <br />at^acent to diis lot and that dim is the possibility for noise. <br />Tactiiwaw indicateH potential purchasers would be informed of that as well as the fact that diere would be <br />offices across die street <br />McMillan inquired what type of lighting would be on the building. <br />Tnhmaw stated they would be installing a 60-watt bulb on each of the decks, a light over the entrance to <br />die g«fge and die fire doors, and a chandelier in the fimit entryway. <br />White inquired whether die deck lights would be downcast <br />stated the lights would work off a switch and would be an exterior type light <br />McMillan inquired whether any lighting along the sidewalk was being planned. <br />Tachman stated diey have not discussed that. <br />McMillan suggested die applicant consider installing low voltage lighting along the sidewalk. <br />Tar-hniaw indicated he would be willing to incorporate the low voltage lighting along the sidewalk. <br />White suggested the ^iplicant consider utilizing I S-watt bulbs rather dian 60-watt bulbs on the decks. <br />Zaohman stated they do currendy utilize 15-watt bulbs in the hallways. <br />PAGE 14 <br />I <br />! I ) i <br />III i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.