Laserfiche WebLink
\ ■ <br />s <br />f . • <br />M04-3010 <br />August 16,2004 <br />Pige 3 of3 <br />Right Side (south)10 ’ <br />26.2’ - house <br />73 ’ - detached <br />garage <br />IV <br />(10 ’ was previously <br />proposed) <br />Lakeshore 75’91.5 ’ - house <br />18.5 ’ - shed <br />88' <br />( previously 90 ’ - <br />house) <br />Average Lakeshore 71.5 ’-98.5 ’(going <br />north to south) <br />110 ’-94 ’ <br />(conforming) <br />88' <br />(94 ’ previously) <br />• <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />■1 21,926s.f. (0.50 acres)Allowed: 3,289 s.f. (15%) <br />j Proposed: 3,128 s.f. (14.3%) <br />Previously Proposed: 3,208 s.f. (14.6%) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />(A typo was made on the on the previous report regarding the square footages in each <br />zone, however this typo did not affect the hardcover levels proposed. It is now <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 7,698 s.f.0s.f <br />(0%) <br />320 s.f.* <br />(4%) <br />0 s.f. <br />(0%) <br />75 - 250 14,228 s.f.3,557 s.f <br />(25%) <br />7,032 s.f* <br />(49%) <br />4,306 s.f. <br />(30%) <br />Previous: <br />4,676 s.f <br />(32.86%) <br />driveways never approved by the City. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 . Should this conforming lot be granted a hardcover variance? <br />2. What level of ground disturbance should be allowed within the 0-7S’ lake yard? <br />3. Should the applicant be encouraged to reduce the footprint of the house, which is <br />currently proposed at 2,288 square feet, not including the garage even though the <br />structural coverage requirement is met? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends denial of the hardcover variance and conditional use permit request. <br />The tq)plicant should be encouraged to reduce the size of the house and/or garage. <br />Staff also recommends denial of the conditional use permit request as currently <br />presented. Following a site visit from the City Engineer the applicant will be directed to <br />an alternative solution for restoring the slope located between ^e 934 and 944 elevations. <br />itbA