My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
zone be removed. If the Planning Commission considers this a rebuild, the applicant should be held to <br />the 2S percent hardcover within the 7S’*2S0' zone and 0 percent within the 0-7S* zone. <br />Oundlach noted a letter has been distributed to the Planning Commission regarding the foundation of <br />this residence, which indicates that a further review is necessary in conjunction with the soils and <br />existing footprint. <br />Capra stated at the present time he is proposing to remodel the existing residence rather than construct a <br />new residence. Capra stated he would like to retain the current driveway, which enables him to park his <br />boat and vehiclea. Capra indicated he would also like to construct a deck on the second level, which <br />would extend over the driveway. Capra indicated the gravel in front of the deck could be removed as <br />well u a walkway. <br />Winkqr inquired what the size of the patio is. <br />Oundlach stated she is unsure at this time what the existing patio consists of, but that she is <br />recommendation a reduction of200 square foet <br />Chair Rahn asked for public comments on this application. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Capra I il n il< -i be has recently driven around the city and observed the construction that is going on <br />in this area. Capra stated in his view he is not attempting to do anything more than the other property <br />owners that are undergoing renovation at the present time. Capra stated his current residence is an <br />eyesore and has not been used in three to four years. Capra indicated he would like to improve the <br />appearance of the property. <br />Kempf stated in his opinion the first issue to discuss is whether this is a remodel or a rebuild, and that in <br />his opinion diis project is close to die SO percent, but that he would consider it a remodel radier than a <br />rebuild. <br />Rahn commented he doea not feel that people who remodel should be rewarded over new construction. <br />noting that the new residence wu recently denied at a 30 percent limit Rahn pointed out the proposed <br />I <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.