04-11-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6: i‘ ‘f"-’MM _ V. ., V . ;V h: Lfp k path between tiie contours 944 and die lake as a means for lake access or an alternative stairway or odier pennitted lake access could be approved at die time of building permit The two dissenting Commissioners felt that the application should be held to the standards of a rebuild (i.e. no more than 2S% hardcover), and should not be treated as an addition/remodel. Staff Recommmidation The following staff recommendation is two-fold depending on whether the application is reviewed as an addition/remodel or a rebuild: lA (if it is an addition/remodel). Approval of a hardcover variance for the 7S ’-2S0* zone stipulating additional hardcover removals as shown on Exhibit F and engineer confirmation th^ the existing foundation is sufficient to siqiport the proposed improvements. 2A. Denial of a hardcover variance to permit 4.4% hardcover, as shown, within the 0-75 ’ zone. The qifdicant should be required to remove the lakeside shed and small wall, the retaining wall dong the southern property line and the stone path (the hardcover labeled as “rock wall ” in hardcover calculations is not considered hardcover but rather rip-rap and will be permitted to remain). The applicant may choose to keep the existing stone path between contours 944 and the lake as a means for lake access. An alternative stairway or other access (between the 944 contours and lake) may be approved at the time of building permit. IB (if it is a rebuild). Should the Council find that the level of work proposed constitutes review as a rebuild rather than an addition/remodei; staff would recommend that no hardcover variance be granted for the 75 ’-250’ zone. 2B. Should the Council find that the level of work proposed constitutes review as a rebuild rather than an addition/remodel, staff would maintain the existing recommendation noted in 2A above for the 0-75 ’ variance request. Based on previous similar applications, staff has provided the following additional information to better aid in determining whether the proposal reaches the level of a rebuild or addition/remodel; • Square footage existing bouse ^ 1,091 s.f. (1** story to remain, second story >vill be rebuilt) • Square footage new garage/mud room ™ 1,543 s.f. (1** story consists of 3-car garage, mud room, and study; 2"^ story consists of storage above garage, bathroom and closet) • Square footage existing detached garage to be removed « 440 s.f. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct staff to draft a resolution approving the request: 1) as recommended by the Planning Commission, 2) including additional restrictions, 3) some other revision not yet menti<• I Or, Deny the request ■ n, .'.h I-,/ ,*v. ■'■“'•neo ■/»; s- ^ iia< ■ nitJia iiIrTthuftt