Laserfiche WebLink
>««• Mi^tC <br />FILE #05-3074 <br />15 February 2005 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Date Applicatioa Received: 12-22-04 <br />Date Applkatioa Coneidered as Complete: 01-06-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Eipires: 03-06-05 <br />To:Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Fronl: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Melanie Curtis, City Plaime^j^|^j|j(/i, <br />February 15,2005 <br />05-3074, Sean & Melissa Wambold, 1379 Park Drive <br />- After-the-Fact Variance and Conditional Use Permit <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre/l 40 ’ <br />Lot Area: 1 >3 acre (56,845 s.f.) <br />A/^icatioH Summaiy: This qiplication was tabled at your January meeting in order for <br />the applicants to have time to hire a landscape professional to design a hardcover removal <br />plan and to determine the areas of hardcover and walls which are critical to remain._____ <br />SU^ Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends denial of the after-the-fact <br />hardcover variance and approval of a conditional use permit in order to re-grade the 0- <br />75’ setback zone. _________________________________ <br />List of Exhibits <br />A. Hardcover removal plan dated 02-15-05 <br />B. City Engineer Recommendation <br />C. PC Report of 01-06-05 <br />ver Calculations; <br />Hardcover Zone Total Areata <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 11,350 s.f.0s.f <br />(0%) <br />935 s.f * <br />(8.24 %) <br />268 s.f <br />(2.36 %) <br />75 - 250 26,423 s.r.6,605.75 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />8,193 s.f* <br />(31%) <br />6,605 s.f <br />(25%) <br />250 - 500 20,834 s.f.6,250 s.f. <br />(30%) <br />3,356 s.f * <br />(16.1%) <br />3.356 s.f <br />(16.1%) <br />After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Hardcover Variauce <br />The applicants have proposed hardcover removals in both the 0-75’ and the 75’-2S0’ <br />zones. Hardeover removals within the 7S ’-2S0’ zone would result in a reduction 1,588 <br />s.f. for 25% total. Within the 0-75’ zone the applicants are proposing removals, but have <br />II